RESUMO
Background: The Corona Virus (COVID-19) has had a profound impact on healthcare systems worldwide, with interruptions to medical practices including the delivery of cancer treatment. Skin cancer is one of the leading causes of malignancy worldwide, with later stages of disease correlating to poorer prognosis. Immunocompromized and elderly patients represent populations that are at higher risk for adverse outcomes related to skin cancer, treatment delay and COVID-19 infection. Methodology: Patients aged 65 and above who underwent surgical management of skin cancers from 31 January 2020 to 31 January 2021 were included in this study then compared with samples pre- and post-pandemic. Retrospective analysis was performed regarding: date of referral to date of surgery, skin cancer type, location of cancer, surgery performed, anaesthesia used, sutures used and outcomes. Data was compared to national guidelines. Results: Five hundred and twenty skin cancers were included in this analysis, of which 340 were treated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Of the cohort treated during the pandemic, 44.2% (n = 111) received excision and direct closure, 13.1% (n = 33) underwent reconstruction by integra dermal substitute, 3.2% (n = 8) by split thickness skin graft, 6.4% (n = 16) by full thickness skin grafts and 33.1% (n = 83) by local flaps. Complete excision was achieved in 88.5% of cases (n = 301). The mean time from referral to surgery was 119 days. There were no deaths associated with COVID-19. Conclusion: Safe and prompt treatment of head and neck skin cancers is achievable despite the COVID-19 pandemic. Measures to minimize infection risk include the use of teledermatology, reliable COVID-19 testing, Green Pathways and a reduction in the mean referral to surgery time.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Daily use of marijuana is rising in adolescents, along with consumption of high potency marijuana products (high % Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol or THC). These dual, related trends have opened gaps in understanding the long-term effects of daily consumption of a high dose of THC in adolescents and whether a therapeutic dose of cannabidiol (CBD) modulates THC effects. METHODS: Adolescent squirrel monkeys (Saimiri boliviensis) were treated daily for four months with vehicle (n = 4), a high THC dose (1 mg/kg i.m.; n = 4), or THC + CBD (1 mg/kg +3 mg/kg i.m.; n = 4), to investigate whether: (1) a daily high THC dose affects performance in tasks of cognition (repeated acquisition, discrimination reversal); (2) a daily high THC dose affects spontaneous behavior and day/night activity (3) tolerance develops to the behavioral effects of THC; (4) whether CBD modulates THC effects. RESULTS: THC impaired performance of adolescent monkeys in a cognitive test initially, but not performance on a task of cognitive flexibility. THC reduced motor activity and increased sedentary behavior, with tolerance developing after weeks of daily treatment. Co-administered with THC, CBD did not modulate THC effects on cognitive performance, activity or tolerance, but prevented THC-induced emesis on the first day of daily treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Daily high dosing with THC compromised performance on a task of cognition, and reduced activity in adolescent primates, with tolerance developing within weeks. Whether our observations are relevant to a broader range of cognitive tasks vital for daily function in human adolescents is uncertain.
